A reign is not an exact day

Shaukat Mahmood’s 1981 thesis records a Persian inscription above the southern entrance arch of Muhammad Shah Maujdarya’s mausoleum in Lahore. He describes glazed tilework and nastaliq script. His accompanying English translation assigns construction to Akbar’s reign. It does not provide a numbered year, month and day. The research value lies in preserving what that particular panel says, its material and its position. A shrine’s association with a ruler cannot supply a more precise date than the inspected reading allows. This guide follows Mahmood’s published translation rather than claiming a new reading of the Persian surface.[1]

Identify the event and calendar

Ziyaud-Din A. Desai’s epigraphic survey explains that inscriptions can commemorate construction, a person’s death or an endowment, among other events. A date therefore needs its stated action alongside it. A death date is not automatically the completion date of a tomb. His discussion also distinguishes Hijra dates, chronograms calculated through letter values, regnal years and other eras. Some records omit the day or month. For a shrine record, transcribe the reported date and calendar designation before adopting a published conversion. Retain the scholar’s reading, the event it dates and any missing element as separate fields. A bare year copied into a timeline would discard those distinctions and could make an uncertain association appear exact.[2]

Record what could not be read

Mahmood also reports Persian couplets below the mausoleum’s dome that were too poorly preserved to read. He distinguishes these from lower-wall inscriptions with raised lettering, whose lime-based material he proposes rather than establishes with certainty. Unread writing is not absent writing, and an uncertain material identification is not a confirmed analysis. Record the survey’s date and these qualifications. They prevent a later research note from inventing lost text or describing an old observation as the shrine’s present state.[1]

Sources & notes

Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.

  1. Shaukat Mahmood; University of Edinburgh doctoral thesis. Islamic inscriptions in Pakistani architecture to 1707, volume 2 ↗original architectural and epigraphic research · Source date: 1981 repository thesis date · Locator: Actual 328-page volume 2 PDF: printed p.462 / PDF p.168, complete Epigraphy discussion of Muhammad Shah Maujdarya mausoleum; repository author/date fields. Accessed 2026-11-02.Actual 12,817,907-byte PDF downloaded from the repository’s observed file link after web-reader size/time limits. Printed p.462 rendered and visually inspected, including the English translation and preservation/material qualifications. The original inscription was not independently read, translated or visited. No Persian verse or page image is reproduced.Return to A reign is not an exact day, paragraph 1 ↑Return to Record what could not be read, paragraph 1 ↑
  2. Ziyaud-Din A. Desai; Encyclopaedia Iranica. Epigraphy v. Inscriptions from the Indian subcontinent ↗authored scholarly epigraphic reference · Source date: 1998-12-15; updated 2013-04-26 · Locator: Actual complete selected paragraphs on purpose, incomplete dates, Hijra/chronograms/regnal years, web lines 49–59; visible author/publication/update metadata, lines 25–31. Accessed 2026-11-02.Actual selected scholarly body read, not inferred from search text. The article uses the author’s methodological distinctions and does not adopt broad language chronology, literary rankings or population claims. No new numerical conversion or independent reading is supplied. The cited parent works were not independently inspected.Return to Identify the event and calendar, paragraph 1 ↑
Help improve this entry. Suggest a correction with a source.
Record PH-COL-0078 · English edition · human review not performed