Shawl makers and movement

People have moved between Kashmir and Punjab for many reasons and over long periods. A study of Kashmir’s shawl economy from about 1770 to 1870 examines the movement of weavers and merchants into colonial Punjab during the nineteenth century. Its author relates this mobility to conditions facing artisans and the demands of states and markets. A study of shawl makers illuminates one group and period, not all Kashmiri migrants or occupations. Individual journeys could involve trade, work, family ties or political pressures in combinations that need to be researched locally. The study follows both the economic pressures and the movement of skilled workers.[1]

Amritsar and Lahore

Historian Ian Talbot’s study of the Lahore–Amritsar borderland describes Kashmiri weavers moving from Amritsar to Lahore after Partition, drawing on business and family connections that predated 1947. It also discusses the movement from shawl work into carpet weaving as the shawl trade declined.[2]

The examples show that the border cut across established economic and family networks, but they do not represent every person’s experience. Partition involved displacement and violence affecting many communities; the timing, destinations and circumstances of movement differed between families and places.[4]

Following family and craft histories

A scholarly discussion of South Asian artisans describes research into the migration of Kashmiri shawl makers under economic and political pressure. Alongside historical studies, family papers, business records, textiles and oral histories can help trace a particular journey. A surname, language or craft alone cannot prove that a person or family followed the same route. Records also reflect the perspectives of officials and employers more often than those of workers. Identifying a source’s date, place and author helps distinguish a documented movement from a broader assumption about community identity. The study considers the connections between artisans, state demands and markets.[3]

Sources & notes

Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.

  1. Vanessa Chishti. Articulating Kashmir: State Formation and Kashmir’s Shawl Economy c. 1770–1870 ↗Written source · Source date: 2025 · Locator: South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 48(6), pp. 1485–1503; institutional repository abstract. Accessed 2026-11-04.The institutional repository’s metadata and abstract were rechecked for the movement of weavers and merchants; it does not provide the full text. The journal is South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, not Modern Asian Studies.Return to Shawl makers and movement, paragraph 1 ↑
  2. Ian Talbot. The Lahore-Amritsar Borderland and Indo-Pakistan Relations during the Early Postcolonial Period ↗Written source · Source date: 2025-06-05 online; issue labelled May 2024 · Locator: Colonial-Era Lahore and Amritsar and the Aftermath of Partition: shawl and carpet work; Kashmiri weavers’ relocation. Accessed 2026-11-04.Publisher-hosted article passages checked for the earlier craft transition and post-Partition migration; the historian’s underlying records and interviews were not independently checked.Return to Amritsar and Lahore, paragraph 1 ↑
  3. Douglas Haynes. Postscript: The Artisan Turn in South Asian Social History ↗Written source · Source date: 2025 · Locator: South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 48(6), pp. 1586–1594; Artisans and the state, artisan politics. Accessed 2026-11-04.Indexed full-text passage discusses Chishti’s research on artisan protest and migration. Direct publisher retrieval returned 403; the underlying study was not independently checked here.Return to Following family and craft histories, paragraph 1 ↑
  4. Stanford University Libraries. The 1947 Partition of South Asia: Introduction ↗Written source · Source date: publication date not established · Locator: Introduction: Partition, migration and violence. Accessed 2026-11-04.Library research guide checked for broad Partition context; it does not document the circumstances of an individual family.Return to Amritsar and Lahore, paragraph 2 ↑
Help improve this entry. Suggest a correction with a source. · Read recorded changes
Record PH-COM-0079 · English edition · human review not performed