Evidence record · given name

Meaning and use are separate questions.

Lexical evidence: Platts records muḥammad as greatly or highly praised and explicitly labels it a proper name.

Documented use: Muhammad Iqbal is the form used by Inner Temple Library and a Cambridge doctoral repository record.

A dictionary that identifies a proper name

Platts’s dictionary does more than offer an attractive gloss for Muhammad. Its entry gives the transliteration muḥammad, identifies an Arabic verbal derivation connected with repeated or emphatic praise, and records the sense greatly or highly praised. It also explicitly classifies the form as a proper name and associates it with the Prophet of Islam.[1]

This makes the evidence different from a guess based on the name’s sound. The dictionary supports both a lexical explanation and established personal-name use. Its scholarly transliteration marks features that ordinary English spelling often leaves unmarked; it is not a claim that every institution or individual must write the name in that academic form.[1]

A Punjab-connected literary bearer

Inner Temple Library’s World Poetry Day booklet uses Muhammad Iqbal as a biographical heading. It identifies Sialkot in the Punjab Province of British India as his birthplace and describes his education in Sialkot and Lahore. The name is therefore attached to a documented regional life, rather than presented as evidence of a reader’s assumed background.[2]

The booklet places Iqbal among poets associated with the Inns of Court and identifies his Inn as Lincoln’s Inn. Its account follows his movement into philosophy and law in Britain and his return to legal practice. These contexts help readers recognise the person named in a library record without treating Muhammad alone as a unique identifier.[2]

The full form in modern research

A Cambridge repository record dated 21 December 2023 preserves Muhammad Iqbal in the title of Hina Khalid’s doctoral thesis comparing Iqbal and Rabindranath Tagore. The public abstract describes an investigation of call and response, creativity and the relationship between the human and divine. It is direct evidence of the name’s continuing use in scholarly description.[3]

Only the repository’s public metadata and abstract are used here; its thesis file is under embargo. The scholarly record identifies a subject, not the origin of his personal name. A lexical meaning can be documented while an individual naming story remains unknown.[3]

Sources & notes

Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.

  1. John Thompson Platts. A Dictionary of Urdū, Classical Hindī, and English: muḥammad ↗original historical dictionary entry · Source date: 1884 work; consulted Sampson Low impression undated · Locator: Printed 1010; scan part 2, PDF 406; muḥammad. Accessed 2026-11-02.Selected printed entry and relevant original corrections inspected. First-edition text; consulted impression is undated. Modern search interfaces and personal naming intentions are outside this lexical scope.Return to A dictionary that identifies a proper name, paragraph 1 ↑Return to A dictionary that identifies a proper name, paragraph 2 ↑
  2. Inner Temple Library. World Poetry Day: Muhammad Iqbal ↗institutional record · Source date: 2017-03-21 · Locator: PDF pages 8–9, Muhammad Iqbal heading and biographical account. Accessed 2026-11-04.The 2017 Inner Temple Library booklet was rechecked for the Muhammad Iqbal heading, Sialkot and Lahore education, and Lincoln’s Inn. It is a brief institutional biography, not an examination of original admission records.Return to A Punjab-connected literary bearer, paragraph 1 ↑Return to A Punjab-connected literary bearer, paragraph 2 ↑
  3. Hina Khalid; University of Cambridge Apollo repository. Becoming Words of Witness: The Motif of Call and Response in Muhammad Iqbal and Rabindranath Tagore ↗university repository metadata and public abstract · Source date: 2023-12-21 · Locator: Public title, abstract, author, date and qualification fields; thesis file marked embargoed. Accessed 2026-11-04.The Cambridge repository metadata and abstract were inspected. The thesis file is embargoed until 8 September 2028 and was not examined.Return to The full form in modern research, paragraph 1 ↑Return to The full form in modern research, paragraph 2 ↑
Help improve this entry. Suggest a correction with a source.
Record PH-NAM-0004 · English edition · human review not performed