Kumhar pottery communities in Punjab
A Chakwal study records changing work among Kumhar pottery households. Its village cases show different responses to difficult livelihoods and new work.
Communities & faiths · A guide to the archive
Explore pottery and other craft histories through local studies, material practices and the limits of occupational labels.
Choose a craft account and identify its place, date and kind of evidence. A household study, an administrative return, a material object and a reported professional recollection have different limits. Check whether a count refers to people practising a trade or to a population carrying an occupational label. Follow a case of changing work without assuming that every household made the same choice. Compare making, selling and adapting a craft while keeping each source’s local setting in view.
An intentional selection
A Chakwal study records changing work among Kumhar pottery households. Its village cases show different responses to difficult livelihoods and new work.
Art-school records, Sialkot industry, village fieldwork and an adjacent hill credit case show how Lohar identities and metalworking skills met changing opportunities and constraints.
Carpentry training, diversified hill work and Chiniot workshop fieldwork show Tarkhan histories through acquired skills, changing production and relationships between masters and apprentices.
At Multan’s blue-pottery institute, a 2016 programme proposed design and Kashigiri courses, materials trials and support for participating artisans.
How we use sources, explain uncertainty and correct mistakes.
Your browser could not save your reading list. It will be lost when you leave this page.