Courts and thresholds

A haveli belongs within a wider vocabulary of urban houses. The English abstract of a 1999 Lahore study treats mansions as a prototype while distinguishing three house arrangements: an ordinary courtyard, a courtyard-like upper terrace, or no courtyard. It also describes the tarra, a projecting platform linking house and street. Many entrances lead from cul-de-sacs into residential space. These distinctions make open space and thresholds useful points of comparison; they prevent treating every historic dwelling as the same plan.[1]

Rooms around a court

Ayesha Mehmood Malik and Mamoona Rashid’s 2016 paper describes an unnamed haveli in Mandi Bazaar. Houses surround it on three sides, with the bazaar on the fourth. Their case has four storeys, an inaccessible basement and rooms connected by one rectangular court. Shops occupy the eastern side, while the same entrance serves visitors and family members. Stairs and street-facing jharokhas add other connections between levels and surroundings. The example places commerce, circulation and domestic activity within one building; it does not prove that all havelis followed the same arrangement.[2]

Outside the entrance

Daniyal Ahmed’s 2014 study shifts attention from the house to its neighbourhood. It analyses two koochas beside Haveli Nau Nihal Singh, one to the west and another to the east. The western space is larger, but the author considers both as places for gatherings and routine social activity within a mixed-use setting.[3]

His comparison with planned developments treats these spaces as part of a residential environment. A mansion’s architecture consequently extends beyond the pattern of its façade: entrances, nearby lanes and shared spaces affect how it belongs to the city. This is a situated planning interpretation, rather than a complete account of original room uses or a current survey of access and condition.[3]

Sources & notes

Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.

  1. Shu Yamane, Shuji Funo, Hitoshi Ara, Norihisa Numata and Hidetoshi Osamura; Journal of Architecture and Planning 64(521), 219–226. Traditional Urban Houses of Lahore: A Study on the Urban Quarter of the Walled City of Lahore, Pakistan ↗original architectural paper, English abstract scope · Source date: 1999-07 · Locator: Actual 8-page Japanese article first-page English title/abstract; three courtyard-related house types and haveli prototype; title/abstract metadata corroborated by CiNii record 1390001204782362624. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual PDF’s English abstract and title were read. No full Japanese-body reading, independent plan measurement or new field survey is claimed.Return to Courts and thresholds, paragraph 1 ↑
  2. Ayesha Mehmood Malik and Mamoona Rashid; Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 6(1), 77–84. Islamic Ideology and the Evolution of Courtyard: A Case Study of a Havili, Old City Lahore ↗architectural case interpretation with underlying-plan limits · Source date: 2016 (Spring issue) · Locator: Actual journal PDF: printed 79–80/PDF 4–5, anonymous Mandi Bazaar case and rectangular courtyard, shops, single entrance, stairs and street-facing jharokhas; printed 81–83/PDF 6–8 interpretation read but theological causal conclusion excluded. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual case description and interpretation were read. Its underlying plan’s Ibid references are ambiguous; neither a fresh site survey nor a doctrinal cause for the plan is asserted.Return to Rooms around a court, paragraph 1 ↑
  3. Daniyal Ahmed; Journal of Research in Architecture and Planning 17, second issue, 39–45. Analysis of Koocha Haveli Nau Nihal Singh, the Walled City, Lahore ↗original urban spatial analysis · Source date: 2014 second issue · Locator: Actual 7-page PDF: printed 41/PDF 3, Selection Criteria and two koochas east/west of the haveli, site-plan context; printed 42–44/PDF 4–6 comparative analysis and spatial tables; conclusions PDF 6. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual case-selection and spatial analysis were read. A planning argument is distinguished from a current condition/access survey or verified foundation date.Return to Outside the entrance, paragraph 1 ↑Return to Outside the entrance, paragraph 2 ↑
Help improve this entry. Suggest a correction with a source.
Record PH-CUL-0094 · English edition · human review not performed