Courtly devotion

Kangra painting belongs within a wider landscape of hill-court art. The Met’s Pavilion with Krishna Paintings, an opaque watercolour on paper dated about 1800, offers one example. Its label describes nine episodes involving Vishnu and Krishna on a small marble pavilion. The curator tentatively interprets the building as a ruler’s puja room, perhaps situated in a palace courtyard or garden, and relates the image to the Kangra household’s devotion. This particular work brings courtly setting and worship together; it does not define every Pahari painting.[2]

Paper and the plains

A 2024 conservation study makes another connection through the paper supporting Pahari drawings and paintings in Leiden’s Wereldmuseum. Amélie Couvrat Desvergnes and Agnieszka Helman-Ważny examined 112 items macroscopically and analysed 81 micro-samples. Their findings identify varied plant fibres, including sunn hemp and cotton. Drawing on material analysis and historical evidence, they interpret the pulp as involving reused cloth, ropes, mats and other fibrous products.[1]

The term Sialkoti associates this paper with Sialkot’s manufacturing history in the Punjab plains. Fibre identification, however, does not establish a particular mill for every sheet. The study concerns a broader Pahari collection, so its evidence cannot simply be assigned to Kangra alone.[1]

New homes for paintings

Paintings also connect the hills and plains through collecting. Vrinda Agrawal’s archival essay follows M. S. Randhawa’s work with hill collections after Partition, including letters and acquisitions for Chandigarh. She identifies contacts in Guler, Chamba and Nurpur and discusses a 1953 letter concerning the purchase of paintings.[3]

Acquisition was not the only result of these encounters. Agrawal notes that budget and other constraints prevented some purchases, while Randhawa’s publications recorded collections that later dispersed. A museum location therefore represents another stage in a painting’s history, distinct from its original place of production.[3]

Sources & notes

Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.

  1. Amélie Couvrat Desvergnes and Agnieszka Helman-Ważny; Heritage Science 12, 268. Sialkoti paper used by Pahari artists: raw materials and fibre analysis ↗original conservation/material-analysis research · Source date: 2024-07-31 · Locator: Actual HTML lines 39–41 abstract; Methods/macroscopic/microscopic examination lines 84–91; original fibre findings including cotton 159–163; Conclusion 191–193. Related Wereldmuseum story checked for project identity; selected claims use the scientific paper. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual methods, selected findings and conclusion were read. Fibre identification is distinguished from a demonstrated mill location for every sheet. Historical craft summaries are not selected.Return to Paper and the plains, paragraph 1 ↑Return to Paper and the plains, paragraph 2 ↑
  2. The Metropolitan Museum of Art; Howard Hodgkin Collection on loan. Pavilion with Krishna Paintings, L.2022.30.15 ↗institutional object record · Source date: not established; object ca. 1800 · Locator: Actual web-reader lines 14–15 curatorial interpretation and 38–48 metadata: ca. 1800, Kangra, opaque watercolour, loan/credit. Retained web-met-pavilion.txt. Accessed 2026-11-05.The actual complete relevant web-reader record was read after a direct 429 response. Its tentative interpretation is retained. The related catalogue download failed; no unseen catalogue reading is claimed. The museum website listed this work as on loan when checked on 5 November 2026; loan status can change.Return to Courtly devotion, paragraph 1 ↑
  3. Vrinda Agrawal; The Heritage Lab in collaboration with Government Museum and Art Gallery, Chandigarh. Royal Collections to Public Treasures: How M. S. Randhawa Built Chandigarh Museum’s Art Collection ↗original published archival scholarship · Source date: 2024-10-26 · Locator: Actual full web-reader lines 155–187 archival method, 1953 letter and purchases;191–206 documentation/collections;228–249 conclusion/byline/date. Retained web-agrawal 2024.txt. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual full relevant essay was supplied by the web reader after a direct 520 response. Original archive letters and the related scholarly paper were not independently examined.Return to New homes for paintings, paragraph 1 ↑Return to New homes for paintings, paragraph 2 ↑
Help improve this entry. Suggest a correction with a source.
Record PH-CUL-0096 · English edition · human review not performed