Training through copying
Lahore’s miniature-painting traditions include a history of learning through close copying. Amna Naqvi’s AAN Collection account describes National College of Arts students working with Mughal, Deccani, Pahari, Rajput and Indo-Persian repertoires. Landscapes, battles, architectural studies and portraits supplied different problems to solve. Learning a medium involved sustained attention to existing compositions, rather than simply adopting a small picture size.[1]
Making room for personal experience
Shahzia Sikander’s Art21 interview complicates a simple story of tradition followed by rebellion. She remembers drawing portraits as gifts and bringing relationships and personal experience into an art form she found strongly thematic. School offered a controlled place for experimentation: rules remained, while the relevance and meaning of the medium could be questioned. Her account describes an artistic problem within training, rather than a complete separation between copying and invention.[2]
Sikander also connects regular studio work with the ability to develop ideas. She describes moving between large work, murals and miniature painting, returning to the latter despite frustration with its demands. Time and repeated practice remain part of that relationship. An accompanying caption lists dry pigment, watercolour and tea on hand-prepared wasli for one work. This testimony makes labour and personal choice visible alongside the finished image. It describes one artist’s experience; it does not prescribe a temperament or working routine for every student who learned the medium.[2]
Paper, scale and installation
AAN’s account follows later experiments with wasli, the prepared paper support. Artists punctured and stacked it, enlarged their formats and developed sculptural forms, installations and video work. The collection places Sikander alongside practitioners including Imran Qureshi and Aisha Khalid; its presentation identifies Khalid’s Ongoing Conversation as a 2001 work. These examples make the support itself part of the artistic question: inherited skills could be reworked through changes to surface, scale and presentation.[1]
Sources & notes
Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.
- Amna Naqvi; AAN Collection. A Dialogue With Tradition ↗authored collection exhibition essay · Source date: publication date not established · Locator: The miniature movement, 1990s changes to wasli and media, Aisha Khalid work label, and story credit. Accessed 2026-11-04.The AAN Collection’s exhibition essay, displayed work label and story credit were rechecked. The original artwork was not examined in person.Return to Training through copying, paragraph 1 ↑Return to Paper, scale and installation, paragraph 1 ↑
- Shahzia Sikander and her mother, interviewed by Art21. Islam and Miniature Painting ↗primary artist interview transcript · Source date: 2003-09; republished 2011-11 · Locator: Questions about childhood portraiture, experimentation at school, studio discipline and returning to miniature; final republication note. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual written interview, accompanying caption and republication note were read. No video was watched or audio auditioned.Return to Making room for personal experience, paragraph 1 ↑Return to Making room for personal experience, paragraph 2 ↑
Record PH-CUL-0097 · English edition · human review not performed