Gathered cloth and layering
In her account of Punjabi dress, Jasvinder Kaur distinguishes the ghagra from the English sense of a petticoat as an undergarment. She describes a gathered skirt worn over trousers. The cloth could range from fine malmal to khaddar, drawn together with a traditional waist string. Her recollection of stories about starch and crushed mica belongs to the remembered preparation of particular skirts. She also names harishal among the materials and gives cloth lengths ranging from nine to twenty-five yards, depending on the fabric. These proportions concern cloth gathered into the skirt, rather than the height of a garment on the body.[1]
Two district accounts
P. J. Fagan’s 1900 Montgomery gazetteer uses lahinga and ghagra as local names for skirts, distinguishing town and village usage. Fagan also contrasts the finer material of some lahinga with the cloth used for ghagra. It describes red or blue cloth, sometimes tied during dyeing so that parts remain uncoloured. The same passage places the skirt with a bodice, a possible kurti and an upper covering. Its vocabulary shows how a district writer separated garments, materials and ways of wearing them. The description does not establish a pattern for the entire region, but it preserves specific terms and surface treatments within one dated account.[2]
The 1926 Multan gazetteer gives a different arrangement: women’s lower garments include trousers or a skirt, accompanied by a short or longer upper garment and a covering over the head. The comparison keeps local alternatives visible.[3]
Retained skirts
Aparna Banerji’s 2019 report describes soof-da-ghagra skirts at Khalsa Virasat Museum near Lambra. They appear among family textiles preserved with phulkaris and rugs from different parts of Punjab. Their presence documents collecting and retention, rather than a complete maker history for each skirt.[4]
Sources & notes
Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.
- Jasvinder Kaur. Amritsar to Chennai: Journey of salwar kameez ↗textile researcher historical essay · Source date: 2019-11-09 · Locator: How it all began, saved transcript lines 250–260, especially 251/253. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual article and date metadata were read. Garment layering and the author’s stated recollections are distinguished from a uniform chronology for all Punjab.Return to Gathered cloth and layering, paragraph 1 ↑
- P. J. Fagan; Government of Punjab. Gazetteer of the Montgomery District, 1898–99: Revised Edition ↗dated administrative primary source · Source date: 1900 · Locator: Title PDF 4; preface PDF 6; printed 68/PDF 87, Clothing of women, including final Chop/Bagh paragraph. Accessed 2026-11-02.The title, preface and selected clothing page were inspected, including the page image. Its account is dated and local. The preface acknowledges retained material from Purser’s earlier report.Return to Two district accounts, paragraph 1 ↑
- Government of Punjab; revision acknowledging Edward Maclagan’s earlier Gazetteer. Punjab District Gazetteers VII-A: Multan District 1923–24 ↗dated administrative primary source · Source date: 1926 · Locator: Title PDF 4; preface PDF 6; printed 131–132/PDF 146–147, Dress. Accessed 2026-11-02.The title page confirms a 1926 imprint for the 1923–24 district volume. The preface and selected Dress pages were inspected, including page images. Its administrative descriptions remain dated observations.Return to Two district accounts, paragraph 2 ↑
- Aparna Banerji; The Tribune. Decades-old Indo-Pak satth, museum keep tradition alive ↗firsthand local museum reporting · Source date: 2019-11-09 · Locator: Byline/dateline; museum collection paragraph saved transcript line 255; curator/donation account 259. Accessed 2026-11-02.The actual local report, byline and collection description were read. Its aggregate account does not provide maker provenance for each skirt.Return to Retained skirts, paragraph 1 ↑
Record PH-CUL-0084 · English edition · human review not performed