A settlement with a long history

Sanghol, also known locally as Uchha Pind, is an archaeological site in Punjab, India, between Chandigarh and Ludhiana. An Archaeological Survey of India report describes excavations there and the evidence they produced for different periods of settlement. The site is now in Fatehgarh Sahib district; older reports use the administrative district name current when they were written. Its remains include a Buddhist stupa and monastic complex as well as evidence from other phases. Archaeological layers and objects can help reconstruct a long sequence, but they do not by themselves supply a complete account of the people who lived there.[1]

The stupa and railings

An Encyclopaedia Iranica study of Kushan-period archaeology describes a large stupa and monastery at Sanghol and a group of carved railing components found in a pit within the monastic precinct. It identifies red mottled sandstone among the materials and discusses work on the adjacent settlement. Railings, pillars and crossbars were architectural elements as well as surfaces for sculpture. Their discovery in a pit is evidence of where they were found, not conclusive proof on its own of why they were deposited there. The remains connect Sanghol to wider artistic and religious histories of the period.[2]

Excavation and interpretation

Historian Neha Gupta discusses the 1985 announcement of carved pillars, coping stones and crossbars from Sanghol in the context of the politics of archaeology in Punjab. Gupta’s study examines how discoveries were interpreted and presented as well as what was found. The historical context of excavation can shape the questions asked of a site, so accounts written at different times deserve comparison. Sanghol’s sculptures and structures can be studied through excavation reports, museum records and scholarship on their artistic setting. Each kind of evidence answers different questions about the site and its later reception.[3]

Sources & notes

Source records include access dates and, where known, limits on what was examined. Checks used AI assistance; independent human or specialist review has not been completed.

  1. C. Margabandhu and G. S. Gaur. Some Fresh Evidence from Sanghol Excavations: 1986 ↗Written source · Source date: 1986 · Locator: Puratattva 16, printed pp. 73–78; opening site description. Accessed 2026-11-04.Indexed excavation-report text and the journal index were checked; the direct PDF download timed out. The original co-author is G. S. Gaur, as listed in the index.Return to A settlement with a long history, paragraph 1 ↑
  2. Encyclopaedia Iranica. Kushan dynasty: archaeology in India ↗Written source · Source date: publication date not established · Locator: Sanghol discussion and sculpture. Accessed 2026-11-04.Indexed encyclopedia passage checked; direct page timed out during this check. The original excavation finds were not examined.Return to The stupa and railings, paragraph 1 ↑
  3. Neha Gupta. Social and Political Factors in Post-Colonial Indian Archaeology: The Case of Sanghol, Punjab ↗Written source · Source date: 2015 · Locator: Section on 1985 finds and interpretations. Accessed 2026-11-04.Neha Gupta’s research article checked for the announcement and discussion of excavation politics; underlying excavation files were not independently examined.Return to Excavation and interpretation, paragraph 1 ↑
Help improve this entry. Suggest a correction with a source.
Record PH-PLA-0202 · English edition · human review not performed